Logo GISdevelopment.net

GISdevelopment > Proceedings > GITA > 1999


GITA 2002 | GITA 2001 | GITA 2000 | GITA 1999 | GITA 1998 | GITA 1997 |  
Sessions

Business Applications

Data Development and Evolution

Data Distribution and Access

Engineering and Design Applications

Enterprise Integration

Enterprise Resource Planning

Exploiting Field and Mobile Technologies

Invited Track

Operations Support

People Issues

System Architecture

User Perspectives

Work Management


GITA 1999


System Architecture


Project management and process improvement through software metrics


Metrics as planning guidelines
Rules of thumb for projects have been developed over the years into useful guidelines tohelp plan GIS projects. For example, projects invest 18% during specifications/requirements, 19'ZOduring design, 34% during coding, and 29% during testing (Grady, 1992). Project managers can take these guidelines and compare them to their project plans for a "sanity check."

It is important to interpret the guidelines in the same context. For example, reuse projects typically have longer design phases and shorter coding phases than software projects developed from nothing. Guidelines taken from a support and enhancement project will not be relevant to a new development project.

The following guidelines can be used during the planning of a development project:

Project definition - Projects created primarily from reused code take about 25'%0the time and resources of those that are new
- Projects invest 18% during requirements, 19!40during design, 34'% during coding, and 29% during testing.
Design - 50-75'XOof all design errors can be found with design inspections
- An average project delivers about 350 non-commented source statements per engineering month.
Testing - Typical testing without measurable code coverage exercises only 55% of the code this can be raised to 80°/0 with code coverage.
- Projects created from reused software experience about 1/3 the defect density of those that are new
Maintenance - Organizations expend 2-3 times as much effort maintaining and enhancing code as they expend to create new code
- One post-release defect will be found for every ten pre-release defects.
- It takes 4-10 times longer to fix defects in a mature software system than to make fixes around initial release

What can be measured?
Many aspects of software development projects can be measured including the basic process model of resources, process, and product. Project resources include all of the resources consumed (e.g., personnel, materials, tools, and methods). Processes include time-related activities and events (e.g., requirements analysis, development, and testing). Software products include the project deliverables (e.g., source code, specifications and design documents, test cases, and defect reports).

Each project entity can be measured by multiple attributes. For example, a single code inspection can be measured by amount of code inspected, preparation time, inspection time, number of defects found, and adherence to inspection process standards.

Software metrics can perform four functions. Metrics can help us understand more about our software products, processes and services. Metrics can be used to evaluate software products, processes, and services against established standards and goals. Metrics can provide the information we need to control resources and processes used to produce software. And metrics can be used to predict attributes of software entities in the future.

Page 2 of 5
| Previous | Next |

Applications | Technology | Policy | History | News | Tenders | Events | Interviews | Career | Companies | Country Pages | Books | Publications | Education | Glossary | Tutorials | Downloads | Site Map | Subscribe | GIS@development Magazine | Updates | Guest Book