Logo GISdevelopment.net

GISdevelopment > Proceedings > GITA > 2000


GITA 2002 | GITA 2001 | GITA 2000 | GITA 1999 | GITA 1998 | GITA 1997 |  
Sessions

Data development and evolution

Engineering and design applications

Exploiting field and mobile technologies

Invited presentations

It's a brave new world

Leveraging web-based technologies

Mobilizing the enterprise

Operations support

People issues

System architecture

The best of the rest

Uniting the enterprise

User perspectives

Work management solutions



GITA 2000


Operations Support


Improving service reliability in the deregulated environment


Take the total business approach to reliability improvements
In response to the pressures and challenges in today's business environment, energy delivery utilities must take a proactive and total business approach to improving service reliability. Such an approach involves more than the conventional distribution system planning, engineering, and network operations and control. It requires engineering the business process and network improvement strategies together. It requires utilizing the utility's information, people, and network assets in a synergistic manner. It means in addition to planning and engineering the electric network more effectively, the utility will have to better communicate with the customers and public, as well as execute business processes in all areas together.

Communication with Customers and the Public
Perception is everything. A recent survey of overall customer satisfaction among utilities by J.D. Power and Associates indicates that 40 percent of the satisfaction comes from the utility's image and only 17 percent of the satisfaction is a result of reliability and power quality. Much of the image is built on how the utility communicates with customers. For example, customers associate how much the utility is on top of its operations with how well it keeps them up to date on outage statuses and restoration efforts during storm or other major outages and on reliability improvement measures afterwards.

Most utilities have recognized this need to improve public perception and have stepped up efforts to enhance communications with customers and the public. However, too many of these efforts are ineffective due to a lack of timely and accurate information available to the utility organizations responsible for public communication. While utilities attempt to improve customer facing with blended media technologies like Intranet Web pages and interactive voice response, they still suffer from difficulties in assimilating data from various sources within the company to provide meaningful information. They need to provide information in a timely manner and in a form the public can appreciate. For example, customers care about problems and improvement projects in geographic areas like towns and neighborhoods, not by circuits and substations. Utilities need to adapt suitable analytical engines behind their customer relationship management (CRM) initiatives. These engines and their underlying data model ought to be geospatially oriented (Tram, Engleken, and Gay, 1999).

Coordinated Planning and Management of Business Processes and Resources
Adding capital dollars for upgrading network facilities and equipment may be a solution to solving system reliability problems, but it must not be the only option. There are a number of possible ways to reduce the duration of outages. For example:
  • Add network automation, monitoring, and control capabilities so the utility knows about network problems or potential network problems sooner and resolves them automatically. This involves conventional network protection engineering, Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA), Distribution Automation, Substation Automation, etc.
  • Provide better intelligence and decision support tools to system operators and dispatchers so they can diagnose and take corrective actions quicker and faster. This involves, for instance, trouble-call entry and analysis, outage prediction, emergency switching formulation, etc.
  • Improve the efficiency of field resources by directing the right crew with the right replacement parts to the right place the first time, so travel and repair times are reduced. This involves, for instance, mobile dispatch and combining field resources from different functional groups such as service, substation, and construction, for emergency response.
There are also alternatives for reducing the frequency of outages. For example:
  • Reinforce the distribution network and upgrade network facilities to increase the capacity and flexibility of the network, reduces outages due to system overloads. This involves both conventional and modern methods for distribution system planning and reliability engineering.
  • Improve inspection and maintenance of network equipment, implementing transformer load management, online equipment performance monitors, etc., to reduce failure rates of network equipment.
  • Increase the vegetation management effort to reduce the number of outages caused by trees. This involves keeping track of where problem areas are, as well as when and where trees have or have not been trimmed.
While every utility probably has programs in place to do each of the measures listed above already, most utilities need an information system and process in place to coordinate the planning and execution of these programs (Tram, 1999.) For example, to reduce the average customer interruption duration to a targeted level, would it be more cost effective to add network automation or mobile workforce management? Or would the utility really need a combination of the two measures, one in certain parts of the service territory and the other in the rest?

Page 2 of 4
| Previous | Next |

Applications | Technology | Policy | History | News | Tenders | Events | Interviews | Career | Companies | Country Pages | Books | Publications | Education | Glossary | Tutorials | Downloads | Site Map | Subscribe | GIS@development Magazine | Updates | Guest Book