Logo GISdevelopment.net

GISdevelopment > Proceedings > GITA > 2000


GITA 2002 | GITA 2001 | GITA 2000 | GITA 1999 | GITA 1998 | GITA 1997 |  
Sessions

Data development and evolution

Engineering and design applications

Exploiting field and mobile technologies

Invited presentations

It's a brave new world

Leveraging web-based technologies

Mobilizing the enterprise

Operations support

People issues

System architecture

The best of the rest

Uniting the enterprise

User perspectives

Work management solutions



GITA 2000


People Issues


GIS Education for Mapping Professionals


The team chose core and elective classes that would provide a logical developmental framework and also allow emphasis in areas of special interest. The goal was not necessarily to achieve the most advanced level of certification, but to offer a way of gaining as much knowledge as is desired. Once the final class lists were compiled, academic contacts helped evaluate the curriculum as a way of providing a solid foundation and sequential development of skills. This internal certification has no official status with the Office of Personnel Management's Federal job classification but can be useful for internal management when considering promotions or reassignments. Not every employee wants certification, but for those who do, it boosts confidence about their skills and motivates them to seek additional training.

Because RMMC employees have diverse backgrounds, two methods of achieving basic certification are offered. Employees can either complete all core and a specified number of elective classes (Appendix A) or "challenge" the level by submitting written statements to a list of competencies (Appendix B). Employee names are removed from the challenges to allow the evaluation team to focus on the criteria instead of the individual involved. A total of 20 points are available for each numbered competency. A minimum of 14 points (averaged from the assessment of at least five education team members) are needed to pass each of the competencies. Feedback for those scoring less than 14 points for any competency is provided in the form of a written recommendation suggesting additional classes or work experience. Once these recommendations are completed, the employee is encouraged to resubmit the written challenge.

To achieve intermediate and advanced certification, employees can choose to complete a written challenge. If they decide to take the core and elective classes (Appendix A), they are still required to complete a written challenge. Although scoring is identical to the basic certification criteria, there is an increasing emphasis on work experience in these levels. Again, a written recommendation is provided to anyone who does not pass a written challenge, suggesting additional class or work experience. Once certification requirements are met for a specific level, the training officer notifies the Personnel Office to create an SF-50 (Notification of Personnel Action), indicating the level of certification earned. This document is included in the employee's personnel file. A hard copy certificate, suitable for framing, is presented to the employee.

Education in the geographic information sciences is a lifelong learning process. The team recognizes that rapid development in the geographic information sciences requires recertification. Although there is no requirement to recertify for level I basic, employees are encouraged to request and attend classes in the geographic information sciences annually. To maintain certification in the intermediate and advanced levels, a person must take at least one approved course every 3 years. Courses taken at the next higher certification level count toward recertification requirements.

Constraints
Twenty percent of RMMC's annual training budget was committed to this multiyear program starting in fiscal year 1999. Since participation is largely voluntary and training initiatives normally take some time to catch on, budget impact in the first year was minimal. As in any large training initiative, participation is expected to build over the first few years.

Instructor delivered classes are held during normal working hours and often use in-house training facilities. Electronic classes, such as the Virtual Campus from Environmental Sciences Research Institute (ESRI), are gaining in popularity. Virtual classes offer the ability to complete some of the modules on the employee's home computer. It should be noted that virtual or computerbased training is not a good fit for all employees. Some require the constant and immediate feedback from live instruction.

Program Assessment
Nearly 100 employees were involved in these training courses the first year. Since, at this writing, the program is only 14 months old, it is difficult to assess the organizational effectiveness and impact of this training. As participation is largely voluntary, response to the program has been varied. Many employees, desirous for any learning opportunity that will improve their skills, have already completed several courses. Some employees are skeptical as to the actual value of the program and appear to be taking a "wait and see" approach. Employees uninterested in taking any of the classes, even though they may be strongly encouraged to participate by coworkers and managers, do not see how the training relates to them. As the program gains momentum, skeptical employees may take advantage of more classes, especially when noted that an employee can reach the top of the list for a new job or attractive assignment as a result of geographic information sciences certification.

Written challenges have been utilized in all of the 12 certifications awarded to date. The experiential requirements of levels II and III make these levels more difficult to achieve via the written challenge method. Based on the number of employees taking classes towards the basic certification, we estimate 25 additional employees will achieve level I certification by the end of the current fiscal year through coursework. Once an employee gains a level of certification, that person hopefully will be motivated to work towards the next level. As many employees with a "wait and see" attitude are looking for advancement, if they determine certifications actually help with gaining new assignments or promotions, the program will continue to grow.

According to Cordova (1999), a GIS certification program should identify a worker's commitment to his or her profession, cover fundamentals and principles rather than specific hardware packages, and document a worker's knowledge. RMMC's program should accomplish these worthy goals as well as raise the level of awareness, knowledge and expertise in the geographic information sciences throughout the Mapping Center. It would be a mistake to judge the success of this program merely on the number of certifications issued since the emphasis is not on the certification itself, but on developing background and expertise in the geographic information sciences.

A second organization wide survey in August 2000 will offer a new measure of the effectiveness of this program, as well as provide suggestions on program enhancements. Eventually it is expected that a large percentage of employees will attend multiple courses in this program. As long as courses are high quality, and employees have the appropriate background, this training initiative will continue to help RMMC meet growing customer demands for USGS information. From an organizational viewpoint, anything that motivates employees to improve their awareness and skills as well as making training more accessible to employees is positive. Training can increase organizational effectiveness when it is the right training, for the right employee, at the right time. In order for this program to continue to build momentum, visibility to both management and working level employees is essential. Constantly communicating, selling, and promoting this program will help keep employee and management interest keen. Advertising the courses, as well as getting out the word that this is essential training, will continue to support us in our changing mission involving the geographic information sciences.

Managers need to see for themselves that training accomplished in this program actually improves workforce capabilities. Once they are convinced, they need to stress the benefits of this training to their employees, letting them know how it fits into their personal future and the future of the National Mapping Program. Word of mouth advertising in our organization is encouraging some employees to at least achieve the basic level of certification. The role of the RMMC Training and Education Coordinator is to provide educational career counseling in support of the program. Plain talk on the importance of developing capabilities in the geographic information sciences is essential for employees wondering how they fit into the organization's new orientation. Making this training program personally and professionally relevant will maintain motivation, something necessary to take multiple classes over a long period. Training Administration

Page 2 of 5
| Previous | Next |

Applications | Technology | Policy | History | News | Tenders | Events | Interviews | Career | Companies | Country Pages | Books | Publications | Education | Glossary | Tutorials | Downloads | Site Map | Subscribe | GIS@development Magazine | Updates | Guest Book