Logo GISdevelopment.net

GISdevelopment > Proceedings > GITA > 2000


GITA 2002 | GITA 2001 | GITA 2000 | GITA 1999 | GITA 1998 | GITA 1997 |  
Sessions

Data development and evolution

Engineering and design applications

Exploiting field and mobile technologies

Invited presentations

It's a brave new world

Leveraging web-based technologies

Mobilizing the enterprise

Operations support

People issues

System architecture

The best of the rest

Uniting the enterprise

User perspectives

Work management solutions



GITA 2000


Uniting The Enterprise
Printer Friendly Format

Page 1 of 4
| Next |


Technologies for uniting the enterprise

Peter M. Batty
Smallworld Systems, Inc.
5600 Greenwood Plaza Blvd.
Englewood, CO 80111


Overview
The main focus of this paper is the integration of major business systems, an area which is now commonly known as Enterprise Application Integration (EAI). The problems with a traditional point to point integration approach are examined, and an alternative approach often known as an "integration bus" is explained. The role of XML in this arena is briefly discussed. An overview is given of IEC TC57 Working Group 14, a major standards initiative in this area, focused on electric distribution. The industry trend towards merging of major systems into integrated application suites is also examined. In the latter part of the paper, a few other aspects of technology for "uniting the enterprise" are examined. While EAI is primarily focused on data flows between major systems, there is also a requirement for imbedding functionality from one application within another to streamline workflow. A brief discussion is included on how component and distributed object technologies can help to achieve this. Finally, the issue of distributing functionality throughout an organization is examined, with a particular focus on the Internet, mobile devices and wireless communications.

Enterprise Application Integration (EAI)

Problems with point to point integration
The traditional approach to integrating corporate systems has been to write direct interfaces between each pair of systems which need to be integrated. This leads to an architecture like that shown in the following diagram:



With this approach, in order to integrate n systems it may be necessary to write n * (n-1) separate interfaces. In addition to the major effort required to develop these interfaces, there are a number of other serious drawbacks to this approach. A major issue is ensuring data integrity. If one of these systems fails and has to be recovered from a backup which is not fully up to date, it may well be impossible to fully restore data integrity between this system and all the other systems it is interfaced. Another issue is the difficulty of replacing one of these major systems, since all of the interfaces it is involved with need to be rewritten.

The "integration bus" approach
There is a much better approach to this problem, which is commonly known as an "integration bus" or "publish and subscribe" approach.



n bus In this approach, all systems talk to a single "integration bus", which is a piece of software (or "middleware") which manages the passing of messages between applications. There are several companies which provide this type of software, including specialist companies such as Vitria and TIBCO, as well as some of the major hardware and software companies such as Compaq, HP, IBM and Microsoft.

Any applications can publish events onto the bus, and the bus takes care of delivering each message to all applications that have subscribed to events of that type. For example, assuming that facility updates were done in the GIS, the GIS could publish an event to indicate that a new facility had been added (or an existing one updated). This event would be passed to all the other systems which had subscribed to facility change events - which would probably at least include work and asset management, SCADA, and outage management in this example. Another example of an event might be that a feeder breaker had tripped, which would be published by the SCADA system and subscribed to by (at least) the outage management system. The application which publishes an event to the bus does so only once, and has no knowledge of which applications have subscribed to that event. Similarly, an event subscriber has no specific knowledge about the publisher.

Page 1 of 4
| Next |

Applications | Technology | Policy | History | News | Tenders | Events | Interviews | Career | Companies | Country Pages | Books | Publications | Education | Glossary | Tutorials | Downloads | Site Map | Subscribe | GIS@development Magazine | Updates | Guest Book