Logo GISdevelopment.net

GISdevelopment > Proceedings > GITA > 2001


GITA 2002 | GITA 2001 | GITA 2000 | GITA 1999 | GITA 1998 | GITA 1997 |  
Sessions

A tangled web of pure opportunity

Directions for data

Forging the future

How they did it - and what's next

Integrating work management

Mobile solutions- taking it to the streets

Operations support

People make the difference

Systems architecture

The local government perspective

Tying IT all together

Vertical applications


GITA 2001


The Local Government Perspective


GIS and Stormwater Management


Stormwater Runoff
The process by which rainfall becomes runoff is a complicated process with many variables. Theoretical models pour rainfall amount and distributions over the losses associated with land characteristics into a computation and produce runoff amounts. Two methods for determining runoff in the United States are generally used - the Rational Method and the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) Hydrologic Method. Both methods have their advantages, disadvantages, and limitations and will produce good results if applied correctly. The Rational Method uses a simple equation to produce peak discharges for drainage basins up to 200 acres, while the SCS Method requires several equations but can produce hydrographs for drainage basins as large as 2000 acres. Both methods use a variable to relate the land characteristics such as soil types and coverage to the losses such as interception and infiltration that occur prior to runoff. The Rational Method refers to this variable as a runoff coefficient “C” and the SCS Method calls it a Curve Number, CN. To determine a “C” value for a drainage basin, a weighted average is calculated for the entire basin using the runoff coefficients in Table 1.

Table 1. Runoff Coefficients for Various Land Uses

Description of Area     Runoff Coefficients
Downtown Areas Commercial   0.70 – 0.95
  Neighborhood Areas   0.50 – 0.70
Residential Single-Family   0.30 – 0.50
  Multi-Family Attached   0.60 – 0.75
  Multi-Family Detached   0.40 – 0.60
  Suburban   0.25 – 0.40
  ½ acre lots or greater   0.30 – 0.45
  Apartments   0.50 – 0.70
Industrial:  Light Areas   0.50 – 0.80
  Heavy Areas   0.60 – 0.90
Parks, Cemeteries     0.10 – 0.25
Playgrounds     0.20 – 0.40
Unimproved Areas     0.10 – 0.30
Railroad Yard Areas     0.20 – 0.40
Streets:  Asphalt   0.70 – 0.95
  Concrete   0.80 – 0.95
Drives and Sidewalks     0.75 – 0.85
Roofs     0.75 – 0.95

Source: Hydrology, Federal Highway Administration, HEC No. 19, 1984

Similarly, a curve number for a drainage basin requires the calculation of a weighted average; however, unlike the range of Runoff Coefficients, the curve number has specific values for land uses on different soil types. The Soil Conservation Service defines the four Hydrological Soil types as follows:

Group A Soils having a low runoff potential due to high infiltration rates. These soils consist primarily of deep, well-drained sands and gravels.

Group B Soils having a moderately low runoff potential due to moderate infiltration rates. These soils consist primarily of moderately deep to deep, moderately well to well drained soils with moderately fine to moderately course textures.

Group C Soils having a moderately high runoff potential due to slow infiltration rates. These soils consist primarily of soils in which a layer exists near the surface that impedes infiltration or soils with moderately fine to fine textures.

Group D Soils having a high runoff potential due to very slow infiltration rates. These soils consist primarily of clays with high swelling potential, soils with high water tables, soils with claypan or a clay layer near the surface, and soils with bedrock at or near the surface.



Using the different soil types and the appropriate land use, a Curve Number can be determined for a drainage basin based on the values in Table 2.

Table 2. Runoff Curve Numbers for Urban Areas

Curve Number for Hydrologic Soil Group
Description of Area  % Imp  A  B  C  D
Lawns, open spaces, parks, golf courses cemeteries, etc.
Good condition 75% or more grass coverage  39  61  74  80
Fair condition 50% to 75% grass coverage  49  69  79  84
Poor condition less than 50% grass coverage  68  79  86  89
Parking Lots, Roofs and Driveways  98  98  98  98
Streets and Roads:
Paved w/curbs & storm sewers excl. ROW   98  98  98  98
Gravel including ROW  76  85  89  91
Dirt including ROW  72  82  87  89
Paved w/open ditches including ROW  83  89  92  93
Commercial and Business Areas  85%  89  92  94  95
Industrial and Manufacturing Districts  72%  81  88  91  93
Residential
1/8 acre lot or less, Apartments and Townhouses  65%  77  85  90  92
Ό acre lot  38%  61  75  83  87
1/3 acre lot  30%  57  72  81  86
½ acre lot  25%  54  70  80  85
1 acre lot  20 %  51  68  79  84
Agricultural Land Uses
Pasture or Range Land
Good condition, protected from grazing  39  61  74  80
Fair condition, some grazing, mowed for hay  49  69  79  84
Poor condition, used for grazing  68  79  86  89
Cultivated land with conservation treatments  62  71  78  81
Cultivated land without conservation treatments  72  81  88  91
Wood or forested land
Mature stand with good cover  25  55  70  77
Thin stand, with poor cover  45  66  77  83

Source: National Engineering Handbook, Section 4, “Hydrology” Chapter 9, August 1972.

Page 2 of 4
| Previous | Next |

Applications | Technology | Policy | History | News | Tenders | Events | Interviews | Career | Companies | Country Pages | Books | Publications | Education | Glossary | Tutorials | Downloads | Site Map | Subscribe | GIS@development Magazine | Updates | Guest Book