|
|
|
The Local Government Perspective
|
GIS and Stormwater Management
Stormwater Runoff
The process by which rainfall becomes runoff is a complicated process with many
variables. Theoretical models pour rainfall amount and distributions over the losses associated
with land characteristics into a computation and produce runoff amounts. Two methods for
determining runoff in the United States are generally used - the Rational Method and the Soil
Conservation Service (SCS) Hydrologic Method. Both methods have their advantages,
disadvantages, and limitations and will produce good results if applied correctly. The Rational
Method uses a simple equation to produce peak discharges for drainage basins up to 200 acres,
while the SCS Method requires several equations but can produce hydrographs for drainage
basins as large as 2000 acres. Both methods use a variable to relate the land characteristics such
as soil types and coverage to the losses such as interception and infiltration that occur prior to
runoff. The Rational Method refers to this variable as a runoff coefficient C and the SCS
Method calls it a Curve Number, CN. To determine a C value for a drainage basin, a weighted
average is calculated for the entire basin using the runoff coefficients in Table 1.
Table 1. Runoff Coefficients for Various Land Uses
| Description of Area |
|
|
Runoff Coefficients |
| Downtown Areas |
Commercial |
|
0.70 0.95 |
| |
Neighborhood Areas |
|
0.50 0.70 |
| Residential |
Single-Family |
|
0.30 0.50 |
| |
Multi-Family Attached |
|
0.60 0.75 |
| |
Multi-Family Detached |
|
0.40 0.60 |
| |
Suburban |
|
0.25 0.40 |
| |
½ acre lots or greater |
|
0.30 0.45
|
| |
Apartments
|
|
0.50 0.70
|
|
Industrial:
|
Light Areas |
|
0.50 0.80
|
| |
Heavy Areas
|
|
0.60 0.90
|
|
Parks, Cemeteries
|
|
|
0.10 0.25
|
|
Playgrounds
|
|
|
0.20 0.40
|
|
Unimproved Areas
|
|
|
0.10 0.30
|
|
Railroad Yard Areas
|
|
|
0.20 0.40
|
|
Streets:
|
Asphalt
|
|
0.70 0.95
|
| |
Concrete
|
|
0.80 0.95
|
|
Drives and Sidewalks
|
|
|
0.75 0.85
|
|
Roofs
|
|
|
0.75 0.95
|
Source: Hydrology, Federal Highway Administration, HEC No. 19, 1984
Similarly, a curve number for a drainage basin requires the calculation of a weighted average;
however, unlike the range of Runoff Coefficients, the curve number has specific values for land
uses on different soil types. The Soil Conservation Service defines the four Hydrological Soil
types as follows:
| Group A |
Soils having a low runoff potential due to high infiltration rates. These soils
consist primarily of deep, well-drained sands and gravels.
|
| Group B |
Soils having a moderately low runoff potential due to moderate infiltration rates.
These soils consist primarily of moderately deep to deep, moderately well to well
drained soils with moderately fine to moderately course textures.
|
| Group C |
Soils having a moderately high runoff potential due to slow infiltration rates.
These soils consist primarily of soils in which a layer exists near the surface that
impedes infiltration or soils with moderately fine to fine textures.
|
| Group D |
Soils having a high runoff potential due to very slow infiltration rates. These soils
consist primarily of clays with high swelling potential, soils with high water
tables, soils with claypan or a clay layer near the surface, and soils with bedrock
at or near the surface.
|
Using the different soil types and the appropriate land use, a Curve Number can be determined
for a drainage basin based on the values in Table 2.
Table 2. Runoff Curve Numbers for Urban Areas
|
Curve Number for Hydrologic Soil Group
|
|
|
|
Description of Area |
% Imp |
A |
B |
C |
D |
|
Lawns, open spaces, parks, golf courses cemeteries, etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Good condition 75% or more grass coverage |
|
39 |
61 |
74 |
80 |
|
Fair condition 50% to 75% grass coverage |
|
49 |
69 |
79 |
84 |
|
Poor condition less than 50% grass coverage |
|
68 |
79 |
86 |
89 |
|
Parking Lots, Roofs and Driveways |
|
98 |
98 |
98 |
98 |
|
Streets and Roads: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paved w/curbs & storm sewers excl. ROW |
|
98 |
98 |
98 |
98 |
|
Gravel including ROW |
|
76 |
85 |
89 |
91 |
|
Dirt including ROW |
|
72 |
82 |
87 |
89 |
|
Paved w/open ditches including ROW |
|
83 |
89 |
92 |
93 |
|
Commercial and Business Areas |
85% |
89 |
92 |
94 |
95 |
|
Industrial and Manufacturing Districts |
72% |
81 |
88 |
91 |
93 |
|
Residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/8 acre lot or less, Apartments and Townhouses |
65% |
77 |
85 |
90 |
92 |
|
Ό acre lot |
38% |
61 |
75 |
83 |
87 |
|
1/3 acre lot |
30% |
57 |
72 |
81 |
86 |
|
½ acre lot |
25% |
54 |
70 |
80 |
85 |
|
1 acre lot |
20 % |
51 |
68 |
79 |
84 |
|
Agricultural Land Uses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pasture or Range Land |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Good condition, protected from grazing |
|
39 |
61 |
74 |
80 |
|
Fair condition, some grazing, mowed for hay |
|
49 |
69 |
79 |
84 |
|
Poor condition, used for grazing |
|
68 |
79 |
86 |
89 |
|
Cultivated land with conservation treatments |
|
62 |
71 |
78 |
81 |
|
Cultivated land without conservation treatments |
|
72 |
81 |
88 |
91 |
|
Wood or forested land |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mature stand with good cover |
|
25 |
55 |
70 |
77 |
|
Thin stand, with poor cover |
|
45 |
66 |
77 |
83 |
Source: National Engineering Handbook, Section 4, Hydrology Chapter 9, August 1972.
|
|
|
|