Logo GISdevelopment.net

GISdevelopment > Proceedings > GITA > 2001


GITA 2002 | GITA 2001 | GITA 2000 | GITA 1999 | GITA 1998 | GITA 1997 |  
Sessions

A tangled web of pure opportunity

Directions for data

Forging the future

How they did it - and what's next

Integrating work management

Mobile solutions- taking it to the streets

Operations support

People make the difference

Systems architecture

The local government perspective

Tying IT all together

Vertical applications


GITA 2001


The Local Government Perspective


SPLASH: San Diego’s Successful GIS

I’d like to say that the way we proceeded from that point on was planned, but the reality is that things just began to happen. First, even though the new technology seemed promising, the SPLASH team was skeptical. Could it be accomplished in less than six months? The vendor said it could be done in 60 days, but we wanted proof. We had an exceptional group of technical people working on SPLASH who had many years of background in GIS and had performed implementations on different GIS platforms. We had seasoned City personnel who had implemented the original SPLASH program and clearly understood the business requirements for a water and wastewater facility enterprise GIS program. The SPLASH team had documented both the business and technical deficiencies of the existing SPLASH application and knew what the requirements were for the integration with the enterprise database, called TIDES. We had a solid starting point but there were other roadblocks to come.

It was the second quarter of 1996, the EPA wanted implementation of the work order application, SWIM, to begin by September of that year. Following that mandate, a two-week pilot program was initiated to prove that the vendor could provide the required critical functionality for SPLASH. A pilot was developed on-site using the water/wastewater spatial data. Examples of required critical functionality included:
  • two-way attribute data replication with Oracle
  • meeting established performance measures
  • roviding user-friendly, high-performing standard and ad hoc mapping tools
  • supporting long and short transactions without locking out any users
  • functionality that would notify SPLASH of changes made from the work order application
  • automatic placement of featured-linked annotation
  • symbology
  • user-friendly query and reporting tools
  • the ability to provide spatial data to our City/County GIS program
  • a seamless spatial database that supports data integrity
  • solid, reliable network connectivity
A clearly documented technical review that included our GIS IT provider and City SPLASH team members was completed by the two-week deadline. Rating criteria were established that clearly evaluated the vendor’s ability to deliver all critical requirements.

Page 2 of 4
| Previous | Next |

Applications | Technology | Policy | History | News | Tenders | Events | Interviews | Career | Companies | Country Pages | Books | Publications | Education | Glossary | Tutorials | Downloads | Site Map | Subscribe | GIS@development Magazine | Updates | Guest Book