Logo GISdevelopment.net

GISdevelopment > Proceedings > GITA > 2001


GITA 2002 | GITA 2001 | GITA 2000 | GITA 1999 | GITA 1998 | GITA 1997 |  
Sessions

A tangled web of pure opportunity

Directions for data

Forging the future

How they did it - and what's next

Integrating work management

Mobile solutions- taking it to the streets

Operations support

People make the difference

Systems architecture

The local government perspective

Tying IT all together

Vertical applications


GITA 2001


Mobile Solutions - Taking it to the Streets

FAME Goes Mobile with Colorado Field Inventory


The Odyssey Unfolds
We set forth to help Canon City with their data collection problem, hoping to extend the solution throughout the corporation. We soon realized that we did not fully understand their problem or goals and began to more pointedly question the staff requests.

Navigation Point: Don’t assume you understand a mobility problem based only on how end users or managers explain it to you. Especially don’t assume you understand the ultimate goal upon first hearing it.

Why did they need to get latitude/longitude points into our system? Canon City field staff were required as a result of our reengineering project to enter new facilities designs into the system. Typically these designs were for line extensions. Often the lines to be extended were not in the system. GPS measurements were being taken to provide a correct starting point for the designs. Most locations were in rugged terrain, with 40 acre lots, few roads and even fewer mapped landmarks.

What would a collected point location mean in the AM/FM system? A point could be a pole, a modeled object in our system. However, a point location could also be used to locate transformers or other devices which might hang on a pole. Two points could define a span of conductor. Further, points could define the location of components and spans in an underground system. Ultimately points could be used to describe many more parts of the electrical system, ranging from transmission lines to individual meter locations. Thus we reached the first major issue in our data collection plan. What objects would be appropriate for Canon City staff to collect? When do individual data collection efforts begin to fall outside the centrally planned scope of the AM/FM system?

Navigation Point: Providing field data collection capabilities raises the issue of local responsibility for data maintenance and scope. Be prepared to wade in.

How many points did they need to collect? Once we heard that lines were not in the system, we became curious as to the extent of this problem. It often turns out to be difficult to estimate the quantity of something left undone. We worked with the Canon City managers to estimate that half of the district was unmapped. They generally knew the location and extent of unmapped areas and could provide some data concerning number of transformers.

Why were the collected points wrong or unsuitable? This was the question that kicked off our pilot. Trying to answer the question became confusing. We looked at all issues associated with importing latitude/longitude into our system. We looked at the theoretical accuracy of consumer grade GPS systems before and after selective availability was turned off. We watched the staff collect data. We theorized that some degree of finer resolution in data collection was needed. All we really knew was that some points created from GPS measurements fell on the wrong side of the street in our AM/FM system.

The Odyssey Gets a Project Plan—And Funding
Asking all those pesky questions gave us issues we could summarize for UtiliCorp energy delivery management. The primary problem was not that Canon City staff needed methodology and tools to collect field data, but that they needed to do a lot of field data collection because half the district was unmapped. Given that the press of rapid growth in the area had caused the problem, it was probably unrealistic to expect the existing staff to work even harder to learn a new set of skills for data collection while muddling along with inadequate maps. Energy delivery management tasked the AM/FM team with outsourcing the field survey and developing an efficient methodology for getting the collected data into the system.

At the point of planning a field data collection procurement, we worked with energy delivery management to resolve organizational issues. We discovered that the Canon City staff desired to collect substantially more data than was deemed in scope by energy delivery management. The equation “points equals poles” became a problem. Scope of the AM/FM project had never allowed for collection or maintenance of data on individual poles. Canon City staff strongly preferred to collect and maintain individual pole locations and data. The compromise reached was that poles with transformers or other devices hanging on them would be collected, transformer station numbers attached to poles would be collected, poles indicating significant changes in direction would be collected.

Once it was determined which objects were to be collected, we begin to work on the data structure of the collection software. We wanted to create an efficient way to load field data into our Smallworld AM/FM system. Many of our electrical objects had complex parent-child relationships. Our first idea was to duplicate these relationships in the field data collection software, in order to produce output identical to our data structure. However, configuration of vendor-supplied software to duplicate our structure proved to be time consuming and difficult. UtiliCorp had a desire for a data loader product that would be flexible and easily used for all our electrical objects. We ended up working with yet another vendor to configure a data loader which would take ascii files exported from the data collection software and load them correctly into FAME.

By the time everyone’s piece of the effort was completed, summer was almost over. Our initial data collection efforts were to take place in the southern Colorado Rockies at 8000 feet. We had authorized 28 days of field data collection. We pressed hard to begin the data collection efforts. We attempted to run sample data through the field collection software and into the loader, but the field vendor had difficulty producing sample data. We went ahead to the field anyway.

Navigation Point: Always allow time to test the collection and load process before going to the field, no matter how much snow is predicted. There will be problems with the data structure, you will not be able to see all of the problems without running a bunch of data through your processes, and you must attempt to solve all the problems before collecting mountains of real data.

Page 2 of 5
| Previous | Next |

Applications | Technology | Policy | History | News | Tenders | Events | Interviews | Career | Companies | Country Pages | Books | Publications | Education | Glossary | Tutorials | Downloads | Site Map | Subscribe | GIS@development Magazine | Updates | Guest Book