Logo GISdevelopment.net

GISdevelopment > Proceedings > GITA > 2001


GITA 2002 | GITA 2001 | GITA 2000 | GITA 1999 | GITA 1998 | GITA 1997 |  
Sessions

A tangled web of pure opportunity

Directions for data

Forging the future

How they did it - and what's next

Integrating work management

Mobile solutions- taking it to the streets

Operations support

People make the difference

Systems architecture

The local government perspective

Tying IT all together

Vertical applications


GITA 2001


Tying it all together
Printer Friendly Format

Page 1 of 4
| Next |


Integration of work management some issues

Robert Trotter
Logica, 365 West Ash Ave
Decatur, IL 62526


Introduction
The implementation of an integrated Work Management and AM/FM/GIS (WMIS/GIS) has many benefits to a utility in managing assets. While there are many benefits, it is a large project that has an impact on a large part of the company. The purpose of this paper is to discuss some of the steps that are typically required to implement an integrated WMIS/GIS solution in a utility. This paper also discusses the impacts of a new system and helps the utility planning to implement such a system to consider ahead of time the things that will need to be decided and done. The WMIS/GIS should be a corporate effort strongly supported by upper management and the Information Services (IS) department. The user must be a part of the process and must provide strong support and buy in to this new way of doing business. The installation of a WMIS/GIS should start with an examination of existing systems, procedures and paperwork. Users should examine the major functions: interfacing with customers, writing work orders, designing projects, scheduling work, procuring material, construction management, maintenance management, etc. The users must then decide how best to operate. A project team made up of users and IS people should look at all of company's areas and see how they work; chances are that some areas will need to operate differently. Find the best practice and adopt it for the entire company, then review it for further improvements.

The issues that will be discussed include business case, project considerations, interfaces, corporate impacts, risk management and other implementation considerations. Consideration of the impacts of these issues at the beginning of a project can help insure that the integration will be done effectively, on time and budget.

Business Case
Business cases are very important in getting the budget approvals for implementing a WMIS/GIS system. While it is usually very important to have a good business case that shows an economic payback for a new system, the non-economic improvements are also very important and need to be captured. Often it is the non-economic benefits such as customer service improvements that tip the scales in favor of doing the project. It is also important to tie the implementation benefits to the strategic issues. The transmission and distribution (T&D) expense for capital improvements and maintenance is second only to the cost of generation in most electric utilities. In gas utilities the cost of the distribution system is a bigger part of the cost. Only in recent years have utilities begun to change processes that have been in place twenty years or more by re-engineering and automation of the core utility processes. To survive and better yet, prosper in the new paradigm of competition requires that utilities consider immediate process changes, new organization structures and new technologies to achieve operational excellence. This leads to improved customer service and customer loyalty. Customers able to choose between suppliers will base their decisions on price and service. Using computer technology as a strategic asset offers four primary advantages. First, customer service will be more responsive and the costs reduced in all areas of operations. For example, a request for new service can usually be handled with one phone call. A customer's questions about the status of requested service restoration during a storm can be answered immediately; and work can be planned and scheduled more easily. Second, resources, both human and physical, can be utilized more effectively. For example, maintenance and construction work can be addressed "just in time" based on a known need date. Purchasing can be better controlled, allowing reduction of inventory. Redundant work and mundane clerical tasks can be eliminated.

Third, installation of WMIS/GIS provides an opportunity to review processes and practices throughout the utility. Many work methods in use may not have changed for some time. Also, the installation of new technology can encourage employee participation. Employees know what their work requires, what customers want, and how processes could be changed for the better. Their knowledge should be tapped. Fourth, records can be consolidated, thus improving timeliness, accuracy and availability. This will also reduce the cost by not having to put data in multiple databases. Clientserver technology is in place, but in many cases, high volume applications are used sparingly. It is difficult to fill requests from the operating areas for systems or for information. Departments, such as operations, do not have some of their major functions computerized. There is a transformer file, a pole file, a street light file and so on; but they require that a piece of paper be sent to a data entry operator for input. With the paper system, it is not easy to know when changes have been made but with an automated system the work request is tracked until all changes have been done. This helps assure that only up to date reports are sent out While most utilities are aware of potential savings, it is difficult to come up with an easy plan for change. Each utility has a unique situation, and no single plan could satisfy everyone.

The qualitative value of a WMIS/GIS system is easy to talk about, but it is more difficult to define the quantitative value. Some of the savings discussed above are hypothetical and assumptions are easy to make. Your savings will depend on several variables, such as:
  • Where are you today in work practices, automation, and union agreements?
  • What is the company's service territory and what are the characteristics of that territory?
  • Are you installing only a WMIS package or is it integrated with a GIS system?
  • How willing are you to interface the legacy systems to WMIS/GIS?
  • Will WMIS become the driving force for new systems, utilizing all the capabilities?
These and many other issues and subtleties sometimes make it worthwhile for a utility to bring in an experienced consultant. Often a knowledgeable consultant can help the utility to maximize the benefits, educate senior management, establish business drivers and prepare a business case while avoiding pitfalls, allowing for quick planning and successful implementation.

Page 1 of 4
| Next |

Applications | Technology | Policy | History | News | Tenders | Events | Interviews | Career | Companies | Country Pages | Books | Publications | Education | Glossary | Tutorials | Downloads | Site Map | Subscribe | GIS@development Magazine | Updates | Guest Book