Web based verses Web enabled solutions - Answering the question of 'Dot Com' versus ' Not Com'
When comparing the advantages of web-based applications versus non web-based or
web-enabled applications, TCO issues are frequently referenced. Maintainability,
configurability, and scalability all contribute to the cost of implementing and supporting
applications. Web-based applications provide unique advantages with regard to these qualities.
Maintainability is addressed through the ability to maintain and update software (if any) that
exists on mobile or remote devices. Web-based solutions can accomplish this task through
“pushing” software updates to the client as the user signs on. The software self-installs and this
process is typically unseen by the user and allows the company to eliminate the complications of
coordinating updates of software throughout a disparate user environment. Overall version
standardization and support is accomplished through this process.
User configurability usually presents an opposing force to standardization of software solutions.
Usually a tradeoff exists when systems become more configurable at the user level; the more
customized, the more difficult they are to maintain. Web-based solutions provide users the
ability to configure their view of the solution and to maintain those profiles in a centrally stored,
user configuration table. Users are able to tailor their desktop views usually without the
assistance of an information technology professional or software vendor and more important,
these changes do not compromise the system’s integrity. User profiles established at this level
are available whenever and wherever a user establishes a connection to the system. Therefore, if
a user establishes a configuration at work and then accesses the system from a computer at home
via Internet connection, their personalized configuration “follows them”. This type of flexibility
increases user acceptance of the solution while keeping cost of ownership low.
Scalability is accomplished in a number of ways. First, most web-based solution performance is
based on the computing power deployed behind it. From one to thousands of users, web-based
applications provide companies access to applications at a fraction of the cost of traditional
solutions. Now, solutions traditionally reserved for Fortune 1000 (tier one) companies are
available to mid- and lower-tiered companies. The reemergence of application solutions
providers (ASP) and application service management (ASM) providers enables users to
effectively share the cost of the computing solution with users from across many entities. The
impact of leveling the field with regard to access to powerful, automated tools will increase
competition in the market and potentially fuel movement in the competitive position of players in
various service markets.
The next issue surrounding web-based applications is the communication of data in the form of
business objects. In web-based applications the common format is contained in XML
(Extensible Markup Language) documents. This method of communication is superior to its
predecessors in that XML documents are self-describing transactions. For example, a purchase
order contains the information necessary to identify it and its contents as a P.O. The benefit
XML provides is effectively exchanging information between business objects. Organizations
like RosettaNet have made tremendous strides in defining industry specific standards for many
business transactions. Creating standards and making them available to all participants in the
market opens the world of eCommerce to many players creating competition and fueling gains in
business efficiency. One weakness of the XML strategy and organizations like RosettaNet is that they have focused primarily on commerce based transactions (P.O., ASN, invoices) that
support inter-company commerce. However, intra-company transactions such as work orders,
inventory issues, and employee update transactions have been largely ignored. Companies that
establish standards for these transaction sets and impose them on the marketplace stand to gain
significant competitive advantage in the near term and potentially establish a market leadership
position in the longer term.
|