Logo GISdevelopment.net

GISdevelopment > Proceedings > GITA > 2002


GITA 2002 | GITA 2001 | GITA 2000 | GITA 1999 | GITA 1998 | GITA 1997
Sessions

Applications

Data Development & Evolution

E-Biz

GeoSolucions

Mobile

Municipal Perspective

Network Operations Management

New Technology

Project Management

System Architecture

System Integration

The Human Factor

User Presentations

Work Management


GITA 2002


Mobile - Taking it to the street


The empowered field force - Leveraging new technologies in support of field operations


Allegheny Power’s Existing Mobile Technologies

Mobile Software
AP has had an ongoing mobile computing program since 1996. Strategically, AP has attempted to take a “best of breed” approach when selecting mobile applications. After identifying the chosen application, the focus has been on integrating the many applications to work smoothly together and provide a simple user interface. In addition, AP has worked on maximizing the benefits of its mobile technologies by extending their functionality and identifying additional uses. AP currently is working with three major mobile systems:

Mobile GIS: This application was developed by MapFrame Corporation (www.mapframe.com), headquartered in Dallas, Texas. The MapFrame system is an extension of AP’s SmallWorld AMFM system. AP uses MapFrame’s FieldSmart View and Field Flow Manager system components. The purpose of the mobile GIS application is to put information about all of AP’s facilities in the hands of the field personnel. The map data from the SmallWorld database is extracted and converted to MapFrame’s proprietary data format and distributed to the mobile computers. This data format is very compact; all of the map and facility data for AP’s service territory is contained within files that total only approximately 400 megabytes. The MapFrame mobile client application allows the user to easily navigate, search and view facilities and associated attributes within the application.

Mobile Work Management: This system was developed by Utility-Associates, Incorporated (www.utility-associates.com), located in Atlanta, Georgia. The client application is called PADWorks and is an extension of AP’s Severn Trent STORMS system. The PADWorks application allows the user to complete tasks that were previously labor- and paperwork-intensive for both the field and supporting office personnel. First, the PADWorks application handles the reporting of all completed work, design changes and materials used. Second, the application handles the recording of all necessary payroll-related information. The server-side system components handle seamless uploading and downloading of data for direct integration with both the STORMS system and AP’s payroll system.

Mobile Outage Management: This system was developed by M3i (www.m3isystems.com), located in Longueuil, Quebec. This application is an extension of M3i’s Outage Management System which is used by AP. The application allows the user to identify, locate and track outages with wireless communication of dispatch and status information.

Mobile Hardware
AP is currently using the pen-based, ruggedized tablet Hammerhead computers from WalkAbout Computing (www.walkabout-comp.com), located in Singer Island, Florida. All of the applications mentioned above have been developed specifically for the pen-based computers. The Hammerheads currently run Windows 95.

Previous Pole Audit Process
Historically, AP conducted attachment audits as a paper-intensive process. This was true even after the implementation of AP’s AMFM system. Circuit maps and pole lists for the areas to be audited were generated and supplied to an internal audit team or an outside audit contractor.

The auditors would visit each pole and record on paper what attachments had been made to the pole. In addition, the auditor would attempt to identify what company made the attachment to the pole.

The audit data was then accumulated and manually checked versus FIS. Any new attachments were identified and the appropriate paperwork was manually completed and sent to the attaching company for billing. These new attachments would then be keyed into FIS.

Because the process was so cumbersome, poles were generally only audited every five years. After an internal reorganization of the company in 1996, this process was discontinued. AP depended entirely on the attaching companies to accurately communicate any poles they were attaching to.

Page 2 of 3
| Previous | Next |

Applications | Technology | Policy | History | News | Tenders | Events | Interviews | Career | Companies | Country Pages | Books | Publications | Education | Glossary | Tutorials | Downloads | Site Map | Subscribe | GIS@development Magazine | Updates | Guest Book