Logo GISdevelopment.net

GISdevelopment > Proceedings > GITA > 2002


GITA 2002 | GITA 2001 | GITA 2000 | GITA 1999 | GITA 1998 | GITA 1997
Sessions

Applications

Data Development & Evolution

E-Biz

GeoSolucions

Mobile

Municipal Perspective

Network Operations Management

New Technology

Project Management

System Architecture

System Integration

The Human Factor

User Presentations

Work Management


GITA 2002


System Integration


Convergence of ERP-GMS-WMS-CIS-DM-WFMS-OMS-LIS-DMS—Who Owns the Overlaps? What is the Importance of Integration?


Job Workflow

Document Management, Work Management, Geofacilities Management, Outage Management, and Work Force Management Systems all provide a different level of workflow management. Work Management is more project-oriented, addressing the workflow or work orders from initiation to closing. Not all changes to the facilities use the work management system and thus it cannot be accountable for keeping the geofacilities model accurate and/or current. The GMS however manages all changes to the model from whatever source. It manages the current status of facilities yet does not manage the job workflow. Document Management systems have the capability to route documents throughout the life cycle and maintain them historically. OMS manages trouble work that must be dispatched immediately, but how is the crew time, equipment and materials used during a trouble call different from those items that are managed by the WMS for routine and service work. Another major issue most utilities face is that each of these systems typically has their own mobile components for Work Force Management built into the processes. Why do we need a different mobile solution to support each type of work? Integration of WMS, GMS, OMS, and WFMS is becoming the focus of the industry and is proving to be successful. The best practice approach would be an integrated coexistence between these because each address and solve very different issues.

O&M / Inspection and Maintenance Analysis

There are many sources of non-graphic legacy facilities information. These have been used for analysis in identifying inspection and maintenance requirements. However, the greatest efficiencies are realized when geospatial technology is applied, allowing detailed facilities information to be analyzed with the additional dimensions of geographic location and connectivity. Rather than maintaining separate maintenance systems, a better business practice may be to enhance the Geofacilities Management system to provide more maintenance functionality and migrate the maintenance data into the GMS solution.

Trouble Call Taking Although trouble call capabilities reside in outage management systems, most trouble calls are handled through the Customer Information System (CIS), Interactive Voice Response System (IVR), or High Volume Calltaking Application (HVCA). Those systems interface with OMS to provide input of trouble calls and receive status updates. Some companies may use OMS for call taking, but best practice will probably dictate a coexistent integration. The customer system should retain the primary responsibility for interaction with the customer, and the OMS calltaking functions should be used in an overflow or emergency situation. It is impractical for the OMS trouble call taking to become as tightly integrated with customer data as the CIS.


Page 3 of 4
| Previous | Next |

Applications | Technology | Policy | History | News | Tenders | Events | Interviews | Career | Companies | Country Pages | Books | Publications | Education | Glossary | Tutorials | Downloads | Site Map | Subscribe | GIS@development Magazine | Updates | Guest Book