Logo GISdevelopment.net

GISdevelopment > Proceedings > GITA > 2002


GITA 2002 | GITA 2001 | GITA 2000 | GITA 1999 | GITA 1998 | GITA 1997
Sessions

Applications

Data Development & Evolution

E-Biz

GeoSolucions

Mobile

Municipal Perspective

Network Operations Management

New Technology

Project Management

System Architecture

System Integration

The Human Factor

User Presentations

Work Management


GITA 2002


System Integration


DGetting the Most Out of Data: The Key to Successful Electrical Utility Application Integration


What are the types of data errors that can impact an OSS and where do the errors come from? Data errors can result from data migration and data integration efforts if these projects are not properly monitored and controlled. Here, incompatible data formats, incomplete data, and duplicate data from two or more sources can offer stiff project challenges above and beyond what may have been inaccurate to start with. However, most errors result from a lack of proper data-entry business processes and data ownership. Typically, these errors arise due to limited error checking at various stages in the data management process. Another contributing factor is the inability of personnel who rely on the data to easily make corrections. Other error sources are often beyond the control of the utility. For example, when performing restoration efforts after a major storm (ice, hurricane, etc.), the primary focus is to get power back to customers, not to accurately report how the network was altered. Data-capture problems during these emergencies are compounded by the use of “foreign” crews who are not familiar with the local utility’s data-capture procedures.

The following represents the situation encountered after performing an initial assessment on a typical sample data set:

1 Anchor Text Outside of File  (39 of 7,992)
2. Linear Objects (Primaries, Secondaries, Services) with 1 vertex (1,582 of 26,682)
3. Construction Spans w/o phasing 30 missing phasing 102 missing phasing, node ids, and circuit ids (132 of 3,174)
4. Fuses/Switches/Reclosers w/o conductors 102 not aligned w/ conductor or Open/Close status unset (348 of 348)
5. Primary Conductors node id unset (6 of 20,513)
6. Network connectivity issues 75 logical connectivity (node id attribute) problem 57 graphical connectivity problem (132 of 3,193)


On a percentage basis, these problems may not seem extreme, but their on various systems can be very significant.

The connectivity and phasing problems discovered would have severe impact on the operations of an OMS or an engineering analysis package. Inaccurate data can create a multitude of problems—wrong assumptions about which device has operated to clear a fault, sending crews to the wrong location, over or under designed facilities, and false facility loading predictions that can lead to shortened facility life and potentially dangerous situations.

Other errors are associated with switching updates, loads, construction types, conductor sizes, consistency in device information like regulator settings, and customer-to-facility (usually the transformer) linkage. These data errors can also pose problems for a variety of applications. So, the question that remains is how do we detect and fix these errors?


Page 2 of 4
| Previous | Next |

Applications | Technology | Policy | History | News | Tenders | Events | Interviews | Career | Companies | Country Pages | Books | Publications | Education | Glossary | Tutorials | Downloads | Site Map | Subscribe | GIS@development Magazine | Updates | Guest Book