Logo GISdevelopment.net

GISdevelopment > Proceedings > GITA > 2002


GITA 2002 | GITA 2001 | GITA 2000 | GITA 1999 | GITA 1998 | GITA 1997
Sessions

Applications

Data Development & Evolution

E-Biz

GeoSolucions

Mobile

Municipal Perspective

Network Operations Management

New Technology

Project Management

System Architecture

System Integration

The Human Factor

User Presentations

Work Management


GITA 2002


System Integration
Printer Friendly Format

Page 1 of 6
| Next |


Integration of Computerized Maintenance and GIS

Barbara Schmitz
GIS Global Technology Leader
CH2M HILL
P.O. Box 492478
Redding, California 96049


Abstract

Significant investment is required for capturing, storing, and manipulating large quantities of utility asset information. Two of the most data intensive programs include maintenance management systems (MMS) and geographic information systems (GIS). Often, each of these programs is developed independently of the other but often contain duplicate information for asset inventories. Many organizations are looking for ways to integrate these systems to improve efficiency of resources and data collection processes, and reduce data redundancy and maintenance requirements. Early determination of integration options and methodologies will result in significant increases in efficiency. This paper discusses the major phases of an asset inventory project and important actions that need to be considered. These actions include strategic information planning; software acquisition, integration, and implementation; and training and support. This paper presents lessons learned from all phases of asset data management activities and highlights recommendations for successful integration of MMS and GIS. Most critical to successful implementation is the need to understand in detail the business processes and operational and management needs of the client.

Introsuction

As more organizations try to meet the continual demand to do more with fewer resources, integration of information systems is becoming more critical. Significant investment is required for capturing, storing, and manipulating large quantities of utility asset information. Two of the most data intensive programs include maintenance management systems (MMS) and geographic information systems (GIS). Organizations often already have one or the other or both systems in place to some degree. Often, each of these programs is developed independently of the other but often contain duplicate information for asset inventories. Many organizations are looking for ways to integrate these systems to achieve greater efficiency of resources, improved data collection processes, and reduced data redundancy and maintenance requirements.

Government agencies are moving toward integrating CMMS and GIS for several reasons, but two of the primary drivers are GASB-34 and CMOM. The Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB), in Statement No. 34 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis for State and Local Governments (GASB-34) – requires state and local governments to inventory their assets and report the value of those assets. Assets reported in more than one database, often named differently in different databases, complicate this process.

CMOM – Capacity, Management, Operation and Maintenance Program – is an EPA regulatory program associated with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). CMOM standards specify that each permittee must properly manage, operate, and maintain all parts of their collection system, provide adequate capacity to convey base flows and peak flows, mitigate impact of sanitary sewer overflows, and notify parties exposed to pollutants associated with an overflow event. Each permittee is also required to prepare a CMOM program summary and make it available to the public. The tools that address CMOM include hydraulic modeling, predictive modeling, decision analysis, field inspections, GIS, and master planning. Again, data can typically be stored in two locations and can be difficult to combine for use.

Significant investment is required for capturing, storing, and manipulating large quantities of utility asset information. By determining integration options and methodologies for pursuing integration at the onset, significant efficiencies can be realized. Integration can be done at any time; however, the sooner in the life cycle of a project that integration is initiated, the sooner savings can be realized. Following are the major phases of implementing an integrated CMMS and GIS:
  • Strategic information planning
  • Software acquisition
  • Integration
  • Implementation
  • Training and ongoing support
Each integration project may have unique aspects, but each typically requires similar strategies.


Page 1 of 6
| Next |

Applications | Technology | Policy | History | News | Tenders | Events | Interviews | Career | Companies | Country Pages | Books | Publications | Education | Glossary | Tutorials | Downloads | Site Map | Subscribe | GIS@development Magazine | Updates | Guest Book