Logo GISdevelopment.net

GISdevelopment > Proceedings > GITA > 2002


GITA 2002 | GITA 2001 | GITA 2000 | GITA 1999 | GITA 1998 | GITA 1997
Sessions

Applications

Data Development & Evolution

E-Biz

GeoSolucions

Mobile

Municipal Perspective

Network Operations Management

New Technology

Project Management

System Architecture

System Integration

The Human Factor

User Presentations

Work Management


GITA 2002


System Integration


Leveraging GIS Beyond Mapping


Critical Valve Inspection. The isolation valves described above are in effect, “critical valves.” We needed a way to ensure their operability through periodic inspection and maintenance. We developed an application that scheduled inspections, and tracked inspection data as well as the status of any remedial work.

Operations Reporting. We created several specialized reports that enabled our Operations personnel to query our FMS in different ways. For example, service replacement budgets could be developed based on the number of services of a particular vintage within a particular area; main pipe surveys could be conducted based on pipe footage; and DOT reports could be developed; among others.

Market Enhancement. During the mid-1970’s, a gas moratorium created a situation where thousands of homes and businesses were built in our service area using heat-pumps. During the 1980’s we built our gas mains beyond these areas to serve continuing growth. But by the 1990’s the heat-pumps began wearing out. We were able to use FMS to identify potential customers along our existing gas mains, and develop an active marketing enhancement program.

The Next Generation of GIS

By 1996, we had a substantial user base and support was becoming a major task. We began taking a good hard look at what we could continue to do with the existing FMS, versus the third generation GIS’ coming out on the market at that time. We also had a weary eye toward Y2K. Our studies show that we would not be able to leverage some of the new technologies becoming available at that time, and that we would be severely impacted by millennium date changes. It simply would not be prudent to continue investment in what was a home-grown, outdated technology. We embarked on the search for a new GIS with the following criteria in mind:
  • Easy conversion of our existing GIS data
  • Easy conversion of our existing spatial solutions
  • Scalability
  • Standard data interfaces
  • Support
We decided on the Smallworld GIS platform, we began data and application conversion in mid-1996. By late 1997, we began phasing out FMS, and producing maps and reports within the new GIS environment.

We also made a number of enhancements to the applications described above, which were not possible in our second generation GIS. For example, in support of our Safety Sector application we were able to trace-out the piping network downstream of the regulator and display the maximum operating pressures (MOP’s) within a Safety Sector. Through a link to our CIS Safety Sector analysis is now able to identify specific customers who would be affected by valve closures, enabling safer and expedient outage management. Our Market Enhancement application is now able to identify the true proximity to main pipes, resulting in a more accurate solicitation of potential customers.

Recent Asset Management Focus

Washington Gas has more than 3 million feet of Cast Iron, 1.3 million feet of Bare Steel, 25 million feet of cathodically protected steel, and 24 million of plastic pipe within its distribution system. We have traditionally spent $45-50 million per year in O&M and Capital programs to maintain or replace this pipe. In the late 1990’s, organizational changes, retirements of key personnel responsible for defining those programs, and Y2K issues caused our System Replacement group to re-evaluate its asset management approach and to investigate externally available pipe asset management systems that could support its new approach. Our asset management business case identified significant savings associated with program budget optimization, as well as reductions in the engineering effort needed to analyze our more than 10,000 miles of distribution pipe.
Here we need to digress a moment to answer the question, “Just what is asset management?” We found that to different types of solution providers, it means different things. To a financial systems provider, it’s what keeps track of the pipe in the ground, and provides asset valuation and depreciation information for regulatory and financial reporting. To a work management solution provider, asset management is the ability to manage individual maintenance programs and replacement projects and ensure you are executing them properly. But none of these systems address a more strategic view of what are the most cost effective programs, what is the optimal mix of capital and O&M dollars, and how do we better manage the inherent risk of transporting natural gas to our customers.
Vantage Management Solutions, Inc. a consulting and product solutions firm out of Newtown, PA had an approach that matched our philosophy as well as a pipe asset management solution called Optimain. However, this product had never been integrated within the GIS environment. Washington Gas embarked on a joint project with IT, System Replacement, and Vantage to develop our Strategic Asset Management approach, and to assist Vantage in integrating Optimain with our GIS. The project consisted of a number of business process activities and the following GIS related elements:
  • Pipe Maintenance Tracking
  • Pending Work Order Management
  • Optimain Integration
  • Jurisdictional Paving Management
Page 3 of 5
| Previous | Next |

Applications | Technology | Policy | History | News | Tenders | Events | Interviews | Career | Companies | Country Pages | Books | Publications | Education | Glossary | Tutorials | Downloads | Site Map | Subscribe | GIS@development Magazine | Updates | Guest Book