Logo GISdevelopment.net

GISdevelopment > Proceedings > GITA > 2002


GITA 2002 | GITA 2001 | GITA 2000 | GITA 1999 | GITA 1998 | GITA 1997
Sessions

Applications

Data Development & Evolution

E-Biz

GeoSolucions

Mobile

Municipal Perspective

Network Operations Management

New Technology

Project Management

System Architecture

System Integration

The Human Factor

User Presentations

Work Management


GITA 2002


User Presentation
Printer Friendly Format

Page 1 of 3
| Next |


Digging for Treasure

Alida Cameron
EPCOR
10065 Jasper Avenue
Edmonton, AB T5J 3B1 Canada


Abstract
GIS implementation projects are often embarked upon as a solution for many of the utility’s problems. Technology is able to automate and improve many processes, but without the proper planning and understanding of what the issues really are, a system can be put into place that does not solve even half of those same issues. In 1999, EPCOR Water Services began evaluating its current GIS and the new technology available. One of the findings was that the design of the current system was not able to meet everyone’s needs and that data quality controls were not as stringent as they should be. Solely implementing new GIS software would not solve these issues. A thorough investigation into the user requirements and the current business processes was needed. In the fall of 2000, the digging began. Information was documented in various forms, and through various venues. The information was overwhelming. A software tool was found that could aid in the organization and analysis of the information. What risks, problems, and issues were found during this process? Were process improvements possible? Was the information a treasure? These questions and more will be answered in this seminar.

Background
EPCOR Water Services is a business unit within the Canadian based utility EPCOR – also a supplier of power and gas. In 1999, EPCOR Water Services began evaluating its current GIS (1994 technology) as well as the new technology available. This evaluation was done through interviews with users, analysis of the current GIS data, and obtaining consultant information about new technology. It was discovered that not everyone’s needs were being met and that not all the data was structured in a way that other applications could use it. When looking at the results of the evaluation, it became evident that replacing the current GIS with a new system was not going to solve all the issues either. For Example, the data in the current GIS did not have the appropriate relationships to enable an automatic load into the Hydraulic Model. Instead, the Hydraulic Model update required weeks of data scrubbing. Also, many “work arounds” had been implemented to support the business (i.e. assets could not be recorded as they were in reality to accommodate a calculation or representation). Replacing the current GIS with a new GIS would only solve certain issues, such as allowing for a relational database. On its own, it would not be able to meet the business needs. It was decided that a more thorough investigation was needed to ensure that the new system would be able to meet both today’s needs and future needs. Hence, EPCOR Water Services embarked on a GIS 2 nd Generation Program.

GIS 2 nd Generation Program
With the advances that have been made in technology, it was decided that the GIS Program would need to take on more of an enterprise approach. The scope of the GIS Program became all data and business functions associated with EPCOR Water Services’ distribution assets. Therefore, it also included the modification or replacement of any information systems that contained distributed asset information.

The main objective of the GIS 2 nd Generation Program was and still is to provide simple access to information, and enterprise-wide access to data through viewing, query and analysis tools. This implies a common data structure and open architecture.

Getting Started – The Excavation
To begin the GIS 2 nd Generation Program, the first step was to determine the main business processes in Water Distribution. Each process was described in terms of its:
  • background - why and how it is done
  • findings - any information about improvements over the years or in answer to specific questions
  • questions and issues - any issues with the way things are done or questions about how things are done
  • people involved - a list of those who are involved in the process
  • action items - a list of any action items that could be done immediately to either answer a question or resolve an issue

The business processes were grouped mainly around capital programs or assets. In this way, the processes often ended up encompassing cross-functional areas. The first draft of these documents were completed by the project team and some subject area experts. As the business process descriptions were from only one or two individuals’ viewpoint, all the descriptions were sent out to the employees in Water Distribution. They were also posted on the Intranet and a common shared directory was set up in order to allow edits and comments. Many of the office staff responded and made corrections to the documents to help the project team understand the business processes. The response from the field staff was not as favorable. This was determined to be acceptable, as the next stage of the project would demand their involvement.

Through the documentation of the business process and issues, some action items or “quick wins” could be implemented. Certain modifications have been made to the current system to improve user access and searching capabilities. In addition, some data was identified as needing cleanup and what data cleanup could be done in the current system is underway.

Page 1 of 3
| Next |

Applications | Technology | Policy | History | News | Tenders | Events | Interviews | Career | Companies | Country Pages | Books | Publications | Education | Glossary | Tutorials | Downloads | Site Map | Subscribe | GIS@development Magazine | Updates | Guest Book