Logo GISdevelopment.net

GISdevelopment > Proceedings > GITA > 2003


GITA 2003 | GITA 2002 | GITA 2001 | GITA 2000 | GITA 1999 | GITA 1998 | GITA 1997
Sessions

Data Management - The Evolution of Data

Disaster Management

E-Biz

Global Solutions

The Human Factor

Innovative Technologies

Mobile

Municipal Perspective

Network Operations Management

System Architecture

System Integration

User Presentations

Work Management


GITA 2003


The Human Factor


Three Passkeys to change management


A Shared Vision
Our goal is to build a countywide GIS. This vision was strongly held by a few individuals but was not shared. Buffeted by the winds of public opinion it was difficult to lash together a shared vision. Once a definite commitment was made by those in command of the County, the ranks were able to pull together. Early attempts to build a GIS were thwarted by understaffing, poor planning and lack of executive endorsement. The original effort assigned one person to data conversion. One person was to digitally convert paper maps to computer aided drafting files (CAD). This task, would have taken over 13 years to complete. The employee became discouraged, the vision became diluted and witnesses to the project felt that their suspicions, that a GIS could never be built, were confirmed. One Executive stepped forward and personally championed the cause. He recognized the need to for a comprehensive strategic plan and contracted with a consultant to develop one. He also hired surveyors and technical staff, purchased equipment, and was awarded a software grant. I think he reasoned that inertia could be overcome by momentum. An Executive Steering Committee was formed to guide the momentum. It was a round-table approach.

Unfortunately, the high profile project attracted a cautious public. The public observers were unconvinced that the project was a reasonable expenditure. This made the Elected Officials uncomfortable. Department Heads, both on and off of the Steering Committee reassessed their association with the project and eventually Steering Committee meetings stalled and funding dipped. Finally, the Commissioners assigned the County Administrator the tasks of building unity within the County and assuring the public that the project was sound. The commitment of the highest-ranking officials has been reassuring to the citizens and to the officials.

Our goal, to build a countywide GIS, could only be realized with a shared vision. Commissioner endorsement has helped subordinate officials to understand that this can be done. Further, that GIS is a service to the departments. It has been demonstrated to have a positive benefit/cost ratio and it is useful tool. It will not control how a department executes its mandate. The program is now in its fourth year.

Creativity
Mason County experienced over 160% employee turnover in the initial phases of GIS development. Data conversion, necessary to build a survey accurate basemap, will require over 54,000 iterations of the same task. It is mind-numbing work. The employees were able to help improve job satisfaction. Given the Procedure’s Manual to update, employees automated some tasks, shortened some processes and bought time between shipments. The staff was then given an opportunity to devote the time between shipments to developing skills that will soon be in demand. One person is building a state of the art hydrological model while another person is becoming the County demographic expert.

Moving from a drafting table and hand drawn cartoon maps to ultra accurate digital maps is a giant change in our local government culture. Allowing employees to help design the process to conform to the product specifications has not only led to better job satisfaction and retention. It has also led to visible interim products that have helped keep the project vital.

Milestones
Improved job satisfaction and permission to develop key projects by the staff have helped to draw positive attention to the Mapping Services Department. The hydrological project will eventually collect near real-time flood crest data from the internet. The model will not only serve the Public Works Department but also those charged with protecting endangered salmon. When one of our highways floods, the salmon are tricked into swimming across the road into a farmers field. This attracts negative attention now, but will be avoidable in the future.

Citizens, as well as engineers and salmon are benefiting from the special projects. Simple plots of the demographics were made and donated to a nonprofit group. The group is charged with identifying housing solutions for lower income citizens. They were immediately deemed useful and more refined work is on the drawing board.

Allowing for creativity improved production on a long and dull process. Valuing employee input has made not only a better process, but also a better workplace and a better reputation for the Department. The results shed a positive light on the program, which was needed to maintain a sense of success and motion. It has led to continued and enthusiastic support from once tentative executives.

Conclusion
Wholesale change, on a countywide scale, is an enormous effort. Lasting change can only be accomplished with:
  • The shared vision of top management,
  • The intellectual creativity of employees, and a
  • Series of visible quality products.
Our goal is to build a countywide GIS. Because the endeavor is expensive and was initially invisible it met with barriers to implementation. With these three passkeys to change management, our shop is now running smoothly.

Bibliography Change Management
Breen, Bill and Cheryl Dahle, “20/20 Change Agent: A Four-Point Plan for Bringing Clarity to Change”, FastCompany, issue 30, p. 402, December 1999

Caudron, Shari. “Taking Charge of Change”, Business Finance, p.27, January 1999.

Hock, Dee. Birth of the Chaodic Age. Berrett-Koehler Publishers: San Francisco, California. 1999.

Kotter, John P. and Dan S. Cohen. The Heart of Change: Real-Life Stories of How People Change Their Organizations. Harvard Business School Press: Cambridge, Massachusetts. 2002

Lebow, Rob and William L. Simon. Lasting Change: The shared Values Process that Makes Companies Great. Van Nostrand Reinhold: New York. 1997.

Morgan, Nicholas. “9 Tips for Change Agents”, FastCompany, issue 5, p. 124 October 1996

Nickols, Fred. “Change Management 101: A Primer”, http://home.att.net/~nickols/change.htm, February 2000

Penfold, Sharon. Change Management for Information Services. Bowker-Saur: New Providence, New Jersey. 1999.

Pugh, Lyndon. Change Management in Information Services. Aldershot: Gower. 2000.

Tichy, Noel. “Bob Knowling's Change Manual”, FastCompany, issue 8, page 76, April 1997.
Page 2 of 2
| Previous |

Applications | Technology | Policy | History | News | Tenders | Events | Interviews | Career | Companies | Country Pages | Books | Publications | Education | Glossary | Tutorials | Downloads | Site Map | Subscribe | GIS@development Magazine | Updates | Guest Book