Logo GISdevelopment.net

GISdevelopment > Proceedings > GITA > 2003


GITA 2003 | GITA 2002 | GITA 2001 | GITA 2000 | GITA 1999 | GITA 1998 | GITA 1997
Sessions

Data Management - The Evolution of Data

Disaster Management

E-Biz

Global Solutions

The Human Factor

Innovative Technologies

Mobile

Municipal Perspective

Network Operations Management

System Architecture

System Integration

User Presentations

Work Management


GITA 2003


Municipal Perspective
Printer Friendly Format

Page 1 of 2
| Next |


Build your GIS ... No money Down and no closing costs

James A. Cadoret
GIS Director Huntington County, Indiana
201 North Jefferson Huntington, IN 46750
260.358.4859
E-Mail: james.cadoret@huntington.in.us

Eric Torok
GIS Director The Schneider Corporation
8901 Otis Avenue Indianapolis, IN 46216
317.826.7100
317.826.7200 fax
E-Mail: etorok@schneidercorp.com


Abstract
End your confusion and learn how to build 100% consensus and unanimously agree to move forward with your GIS. Huntington County, Indiana shares their lessons learned both successful and unsuccessful on how they built consensus among the Commissioners, County Council and also enjoyed overwhelming public support to move forward with their GIS needs assessment and pilot study. Learn how the county brought together a diverse group of people, formed a collaborative effort and ultimately reached a common decision without creating public clamor. Main issues will address assembling a task force, appointing an effective leader, providing sufficient and appropriate technical support, and procuring grant money. Most important, attendees will see one the successful implementation of Huntington County’s GIS--Echo its Electronic Courthouse Online which provides public access via the Internet to the county’s GIS information.

Introduction
For the Task Force spearheading an effort to fund, develop and implement a GIS in Huntington County, Indiana, the process of building 100% consensus for a GIS wasn’t difficult, it just took a lot of patience, broad participation and creative financing. What started in 1997 as a formidable challenge -- reaching total consensus for a GIS among interested parties throughout the County and the public -- turned into a success across the board. Less than two years ago, after several years of moving forward while keeping focused on building consensus, the County unveiled Electronic Courthouse Online (ECHO). The web site now reaches all of the county's constituents, allowing easy access to detailed GIS property maps and records at http://www.huntington.in.us/website/mvp_hunt/viewer.htm.. The successful development, implementation and ongoing maintenance of any GIS hinges on two critical factors -- funding and perhaps most importantly, enlisting the support of key stakeholders, which for Huntington County meant building 100 percent consensus. Though funding is important, when the GIS effort was launched, Huntington County realized that building support among both the county government and the public was the crucial factor to long-term success and realizing the full value of the GIS investment in time, effort and money. This presentation covers the realities -- victories, as well as the challenges and barriers -- of initiating, planning, funding and then implementing a GIS. It tells how support for the GIS was elicited up front and how a GIS Task Force of members with diverse backgrounds and interests came together to make the program a true success. The main issues discussed in the paper are assembling a Task Force and keeping the group on course and motivated. Also, tips and criteria for appointing an effective leader, and securing the appropriate technical support, funding and grant support are outlined.

Reality 101: The INS, outs and in betweens of a countywide GIS
Imagine this scenario. You work for a small government agency that's in charge of managing property records for the county and making them available to the public. For years, the County has been considering a GIS as a solution to the property records problem, but such a program has remained on the back burner because it lacked ready funding, leadership and support. In 1997 though, you decided to explore a GIS program and created a large Task Force that represented the entire county including government agencies, cities and towns. The plan was to solicit support from the County Commissioners, who subsequently would seek the blessing of the County Council for funding the first phase of the GIS, a needs assessment. After researching GIS needs assessments and qualifying potential vendors, you approach the Commissioners with a $35,000 quote from one of the vendors. Just hours before the meeting, another vendor reaches the Commissioners with the unthinkable -- an offer of a "free" needs assessment!

There is no free GIS
Much to your surprise though, the Commissioners reject the no-cost offer. Why did they pass up a golden opportunity for the "free" needs assessment versus spending $35,000? The Council recognized that during the previous five years, the county's GIS proponents and advisors such as The Schneider Corporation had focused on educating decision-makers and building constructive relationships. During that period, trust was built, and at all times, the message was consistent.

Even though the Council rejected the free offer, a pot of money was still not readily available to fund the first phase of the GIS. Having to secure the initial piece of funding though was a major benefit. It triggered the process of building consensus across all county government agencies. The Council and Task Force asked all the county agencies to reach within their budgets and find any "available" money to put towards this common cause. The thinking was that when you're an investor, you're going to make sure that the GIS comes to fruition, so you can use this resource once it's built.

More than one way to build 100% consensus
Huntington County's 18-member GIS Task Force was originally formed through an "open door" approach, which The Schneider Corporation facilitated. Anyone and every one from any county agency were invited to participate. This inclusive representation ensured that decision making by the Task Force would consider factors and issues from all corners of the county. In the beginning, success of the Task Force was due partly to sheer curiosity -- participant agencies were all interested in one another and learning about each other's plans for the GIS information and applications. Soon, a team spirit evolved from the Task Force and agencies began sharing information openly with one another. The consensus process was far from challenging, in fact consensus begets consensus. The momentum for a GIS built on itself, compounding along the way. By the time the needs assessment was formally launched in 1997, 100% consensus had been achieved. Perhaps one of the biggest victories of the GIS Task Force was bringing together every agency, triggering an integrated and coordinated mode of operation in the county government, which still functions today.

When the GIS was launched, the Task Force was also instrumental in seeking information from other counties on pitfalls to avoid, successful strategies for funding, and new GIS technology. This information sharing effort also equipped the Task Force with the knowledge it needed to select the vendors and consultants best suited for their GIS program. Early in the effort, The Schneider Corporation was hired to assist with several phases and aspects of the program, including facilitating the work of the Task Force and its leader, securing funding support, determining GIS needs, and implementing GIS technology. Schneider compiled and presented GIS information in layman's terms and also kept the decision making process moving forward, two behind-the-scenes efforts that were critical to consensus building.

Through their GIS experiences, Huntington County determined that along with broad representation by means of a GIS Task Force, the other two critical success factors were effective leadership and expert technical and GIS consulting support.

Page 1 of 2
| Next |

Applications | Technology | Policy | History | News | Tenders | Events | Interviews | Career | Companies | Country Pages | Books | Publications | Education | Glossary | Tutorials | Downloads | Site Map | Subscribe | GIS@development Magazine | Updates | Guest Book