Logo GISdevelopment.net

GISdevelopment > Proceedings > GITA > GIS for Oil & Gas Conference 2002


GIS for Oil & Gas Conference 2002 | GIS for Oil & Gas Conference 2001 | GIS for Oil & Gas Conference 2000






GIS for Oil & Gas


2002
Printer Friendly Format

Page 1 of 4
| Next |


The Challenge of going Global

Jacob J. Parakadan
Enterprise Wide Technical Services
Email: jjparakad@duke-energy.com

Francisco Maria Sarmento
Intergraph Public Safety
Email: fmsarmen@ingr.com


Abstract
This paper addresses issues that energy companies face when expanding operations across international borders. Emphasis will be on AM/FM/GIS implementation related issues, such as handling different government regulations, managing different projections systems, dealing with data and readouts in different measuring units (metric, English etc.), international data transfers, achieving data security, providing access to data across a global enterprise, multilingual user interface, and handling regional sensitive data

Introduction
Privatization of state-owned energy companies in many nations around the globe has had a major impact on the global energy market. Many of the US companies are investing in hundreds of million of dollars in these newly privatized energy companies abroad. Globalization is changing the energy market profoundly by providing an alternate opportunity for maximizing return on investment. Energy companies are looking at how this globalization can best be managed to produce the greatest possible benefits to the bottom dollar.

One great opportunity to enhance the return on investment through Globalization is to move the various international assets to a common AM/FM/GIS platform. AM/FM/GIS systems play a key role on enterprise wide implementations. These implementations provide graphic representation to company’s assets and integrate several distinct alphanumeric applications enabling communications between departments that may very well be in different countries. Different users can now use a single source of data, eliminating cost related to training, data redundancy and maintenance.

Handling Different Government Regulations
Energy companies around the world have been under strict government regulations in each of the countries that they operate. These regulations can vary from country to country. Some of the tasks the AM/FM/GIS system is used within an energy company are:
  • Performing research and analysis (Class, MAOP etc…) on the network infrastructure to make sure that it meets or exceeds the expectations of the regulating government bodies of the country in which they operate (e.g. Department of Transportation or FERC for United States; National Energy Board in Canada).
  • Reporting to the different government agencies on their network and infrastructure (e.g. NPMS Reporting)
  • Determining areas within the infrastructure that requires upgrades.
Global solutions for the global market require AM/FM/GIS systems be implemented with software that can be easily reengineered to meet all of the different rules and regulations enforced on them

Managing Datta in Different Projection Systems
One important issue faced by the AM/FM/GIS implementation team while expanding their systems globally is the handling of data in different projection systems, that is, how data is stored, displayed and reported in each area locally. Energy companies within the United States have already gone through this problem earlier when they started expanding their networks within the United States. Some have chosen to use a single projection system which can cover the entire area of operation without introducing any major distortions in distance, direction, scale and area (e.g. Albers Equal Area), while others have chosen to use multiple projections to store and display data (e.g. State Plane).

Current AM/FM/GIS applications allow the storage of the data into one projection system and the display and manipulation of that data into another projection. Therefore, the option to select a common projection system and presenting the data to the end-user on a familiar projection system seems to be the best approach to the authors. A very important consideration is performance – the conversion will have to be extremely fast to be performed on the fly, which can be a major issue when dealing with large amounts of data. Another possible solution is for the conversion to be performed upfront, so the end user connects to data that is already converted to the desired map projection.

Page 1 of 4
| Next |

Applications | Technology | Policy | History | News | Tenders | Events | Interviews | Career | Companies | Country Pages | Books | Publications | Education | Glossary | Tutorials | Downloads | Site Map | Subscribe | GIS@development Magazine | Updates | Guest Book