Bandwidth
Images by their very nature tend to hog computer resources, taking up many megabytes and
even gigabytes of storage and processing. Getting the data to the user is therefore the first
problem, as current digital networks cannot cope with this quantity of data. Image
compression is one way of getting around this, but it must be noted tha t the current
generation of image compression software, such as MrSID are “lossy”, meaning that spectral
information from the original image will not be maintained in the uncompressed image. This
is acceptable where the image is to be used as a backdrop or for printing, but is not acceptable
if the image has to be further processed. Many processing functions are reliant upon the
spectral information in the image and if this has been changed, then the results cannot be
guaranteed.
If the imagery is to be us ed for further processing then the options are relatively limited. The
remote sensing industry has long been plagued with data delivery problems, in large part
based upon the size of the datasets. Delivery over the Internet is not a solution at present
except where dedicated lines such as frame relay are available. Satellite based distribution,
such as DirectPC (similar to DirectTV commercial television services) is also an option but is
currently limited by availability and also it’s one -way nature. It can be used to deliver the
data, but the request and searching functions need to be carried out over a different
connection to the web. Both these solutions are expensive and are therefore not practical for
the everyday GIS user. That leaves writing to media (CDROM/DVD) and surface delivery,
which in many instances takes away the “up to date” quality of the data. A different approach
may therefore be to change the location of where the processing takes place and instead of
sending the data to the users, a better solution may be for the data provider to provide the
processing via the web.
ERDAS are currently working on a number of products that will provide processing over the
Internet, where users will be able to request processing services from data or servic e
providers. This will enable users to request information, potentially based on the expert
systems described above, with only the end results delivered to them via the net. Based on the
mobility analysis example, a user could request the moisture content for a certain area and
just get the basic information to feed into the knowledge base. This “subscription” based
approach to processing is some way off but will definitely revolutionize the imaging industry
in the medium term, moving the processing overhead from the user to a fee-based service
provider.
Accuracy
Aerial or spaceborne imagery by its very nature is distorted in its raw form, either because of
the movement of the sensor, the lensing system or terrain height variations of the area that is
being imaged. Happily there are many software packages available which provide capabilities
to correct for these distortions and make the imagery GIS ready. ERDAS itself provides a
range of capabilities for simple geometric transformation (in products like the Image Analysis
Extension for ArcView) through single frame orthorectification (in IMAGINE Advantage) to
full rigorous photogrammetric block triangulation (in IMAGINE OrthoBASE). In some
instances, where the imagery is being used to look for relative changes or to identify simple
features, geometric transformation is used. For example, ArcView users can bring imagery in
via the Image Analysis extension and simply warp it to fit their vector database. The imagery
can then be used to update attribute information in the vector database. In this instance, it is
the relative accuracy that is important.
For other more precise mapping application, corrections for the look angle and terrain height
variations are critical and in these instances, rigorous photogrammetric processes must be
used. In the past, photogrammetry has been viewed as somewhat of a black art by the GIS
community, with orthophoto production traditionally being left to specialist service providers.
Products such as IMAGINE OrthoBASE are changing this approach however, with wizard
based user interfaces enabling many GIS users to create their own orthophoto databases.
Overall, the user, dependent upon their own application, must choose the correct level of
accuracy. In general, most data providers now offer highly accurate, orthorectified data as
standard with simple geometric rectification products becoming less common.
Whilst orthophotos can be used to digitize 2D features relatively easily, the ability to get
accurate 3D data from imagery has been more difficult. If a very high accuracy DEM is
already available, then 3D coordinates can be applied to the 2D features captured from the
orthophoto. It is however rare that such a DEM exists.
The other alternative has been to use stereo imagery and photogrammetric software to
digitize 3D features directly. However, this has always been viewed as a specialist capability
and hence was uncommon in the GIS world. With the launch of Stereo Analyst, ERDAS is
attempting to bring this 3D capability into the GIS world by hiding the complexity of the
process beneath a wizard based user interface. With stereo data becoming more readily
available from companies such as Space Imaging (subject to certain restrictions) and with
many aerial survey companies already providing stereo air photos, GIS users now have the
ability to:
- Directly create 3D features
- Build photo realistic buildings using textures from the image
- Create “real world” flythroughs that can be viewed across the web
This addition of the third dimension into GIS analyses is having an enormous impact upon
the proliferation of GIS into non-expert areas. Providing users with the ability to view their
landscape just as they would see it, in a natural 3 dimensional environment breaks down
many barriers and helps present results to the public in a non-scientific manner.
Repeatability
Many GIS applications do not require just a single “snapshot”, but are focused on
maintaining an up to date inventory of land cover or land use. Because imagery is taken at
different times of the year and with differing weather conditions, it is important that some
form of “normalization” is applied to the imagery or taken into account during processing.
The expert systems described above allow for this and can take into account the different
spectral responses of land cover at different times of the year, the effect of sun angle
differences and also the atmospheric corrections needed for haze, fog and airborne pollutant
removal.
Future trends
The remote sensing and photogrammetric industries are going through a massive change,
becoming more closely integrated with a fast growing and competitive GIS industry. What is
clear is that imagery and the technology associated with preparing it for GIS and extracting
information from it is becoming a key part of GIS systems worldwide. It is important that
GIS software changes to take account of this new and extensive user requirement and that the
industry as a whole begins to provide services that match the demands of these new users.
What we shall see over the next 2- 3 years is:
- A much broader range of imagery becoming available, based on new and existing sources of data
- More regular revisit capabilities, enabling higher frequency change detection and monitoring applications
- The growth of specialist services using new digital camera/GPS technology to provide targeted, low cost aerial surveys for specific applications
- The emergence of new “information” providers, focused on generating specific data from imagery for targeted markets and whose business model will be subscription based
- More internet based “on demand” processing capabilities from data providers
- The inclusion of more imaging and photogrammetric processing in standard GIS software packages.
All in all, the new millennium will be an exciting time for anyone concerned with imagery
and GIS!