Result and Discussion
3.2 Result and Discussion
The classified image of Nagpur district is shown in Fig. 4. Agricultural
area in each Talukadigitized as polygon cover and slope direction
is shown in Fig. 5.

Figure 4: Classified Image of Nagpur
District

FFigure 5: Slope Direction Map
with Agriculture and Water- bodies
The estimated runoff from the cultivated land of various tehsils in Kharifand rabiseason
is presented in Tables 8 and shown in Fig 6. It is observed that total runoff
from cultivated land is the maximum in Narkher and minimum in Ramtek tehsil
of Nagpur district.

Figure 6: Estimated runoff from the
cultivated land of various tehsils
The amount of pollutant generated in agricultural land use of a tehsil unit
is the function of different cropping pattern, rainfall variation, fertilizer
applied and area under cultivation. Considering the amount of fertilizer
applied and fertilizer requirement by different types of crops, the amount
of fertilizer used was estimated. The corresponding remaining fertilizer
i.e. the excess nutrient load which remains in the soil after Kharifand Rabiseason
from each Talukais presented in Tables 9 and 10.
This amount of load generated from each Talukawas classified in
different ranges and mapped onto the base map for Kharifand Rabiseason
as shown in Figure 7 and 8, respectively. It is seen that most of the Talukas generate
nutrient load in the range 2051450 kg To 4081517 Kg per year. The highest
load is generated from the agricultural land in Narkher Taluka.

Figure 7: Total nutrient load generated
in Kharif season

Figure 8: Total nutrient load generated
in Rabiseason
The unused fertilizer is carried with overland flow after the rainfall,
which either meets the nearby water body or spreads over the land. The direction
of runoff flow from agricultural land is also shown in Figure 5. It is observed
that agricultural areas in Narkher, Katol, Bhiwapur and Umrer Talukas do
not contribute to water pollution, whereas the areas near Major River Kanhan
severely contribute to surface water pollution. This is shown in Figure 9
by creating a buffer zone of 2 km radius around each water body
in GIS and mapping slope direction on it. Direction of slope indicates the
sensitivity of water body to receive agricultural pollution from adjacent
area. It is observed that the water bodies in Narkher, Kuhi and Maunda Taluka,
which generates highest pollution load, would receive maximum nutrient loading
from agricultural runoff and maximum nutrient loading from agricultural runoff
in Narkher goes into the Vardha catchments.

Figure 9: Buffer- zone Map with 2Km
distance around water bodies in Nagpur District
The simulated pollutographs i.e. the graphs showing pollutant load carried
with runoff after Kharifand Rabiseason in three major talukas which
generate maximum agricultural pollution load are presented in Figs 10 to
12. (i.e. pollutograph for TN ad TP.) Since, the fertilizers are again applied
in the same proportion at the start of each Kharifand Rabiseason,
there is accumulation of nutrient in the soil. The accumulated load is considered
for simulation of pollutographs for the next cycle of Kharifand Rabiseason
and are termed as projected scenarios. The projected pollutographs for subsequent Kharifand Rabiseason
in talukas with highest nutrient loading are also presented in Figures
10 to 12.

Figure 10: Nitrogen and Phosphorus
Load in the Runoff from Narkher Taluka

Figure 11: Nitrogen and Phosphorus
Load in the Runoff from Kuhi Taluka

Figure 12: Nitrogen and Phosphorus
Load in the Runoff from Maunda Taluka
The average concentration of pollutant in the
runoff in Kharif and Rabiseason from different Talukas are
presented in Tables 11 and 12.
TABLE 8: Taluka wise Total Runoff in Kharif and RabiSeason
TOTAL
RUNOFF (MCM) |
TEHSIL |
KHARIFSEASON |
RABISEASON |
Nagpur |
6.90 |
3.41 |
Kamptee |
2.50 |
5.27 |
Hingna |
8.45 |
0.77 |
Katol |
8.66 |
1.78 |
Narkher |
9.46 |
2.67 |
Saoner |
6.15 |
1.42 |
Kalmeshwar |
6.57 |
1.56 |
Ramtek |
4.53 |
1.39 |
Parseoni |
4.40 |
3.50 |
Umrer |
5.96 |
4.73 |
Bhiwapur |
4.91 |
4.64 |
Kuhi |
6.23 |
5.14 |
Maunda |
5.77 |
5.27 |
Table 9: Excess nutrient N and P load remaining in soil after Kharifcrop
Tehsil |
Total N (kg) |
Total P (kg) |
Total K (kg) |
Nagpur |
1197010 |
598505 |
598505 |
Kamptee |
419620 |
209810 |
209810 |
Higna |
1491710 |
745855 |
745855 |
Katol |
1495200 |
747600 |
747600 |
Narkher |
1642850 |
821425 |
821425 |
Saoner |
1034710 |
517355 |
517355 |
Kalmeshwar |
1116310 |
558155 |
558155 |
Ramtek |
795770 |
397885 |
397885 |
Parseoni |
740320 |
370160 |
370160 |
Umrer |
1034470 |
517235 |
517235 |
Bhiwapur |
824120 |
412060 |
412060 |
Kuhi |
1070670 |
535335 |
535335 |
Maunda |
1015430 |
507715 |
507715 |
(50% fertilizer remain in the soil and 50% consumed by the
plant)
Ref: D. Prasad and E. khan, Environmental Pollution – Land,
46 - 47
Table 10: Excess nutrient N and P load remaining in soil after Rabicrop
Tehsil |
Total N (kg) |
Total P (kg) |
Total K (kg) |
Nagpur |
480340 |
309610 |
228660 |
Kamptee |
736925 |
484710 |
359910 |
Higna |
136952.5 |
83965 |
73665 |
Katol |
190855 |
184380 |
135900 |
Narkher |
311117.5 |
276605 |
208095 |
Saoner |
205910 |
147820 |
118800 |
Kalmeshwar |
246617.5 |
163505 |
135645 |
Ramtek |
220100 |
133550 |
106260 |
Parseoni |
489147.5 |
333735 |
252945 |
Umrer |
677115 |
433660 |
323760 |
Bhiwapur |
649682.5 |
424045 |
313845 |
Kuhi |
736520 |
465120 |
345150 |
Maunda |
791512.5 |
492445 |
379305 |
Table 11: The average concentration of Nitrogen pollutant in the runoff
Taluka |
EMC (N) |
Nagpur |
0.049 |
Kamptee |
0.039 |
Higna |
0.107 |
Katol |
0.063 |
Narkher |
0.057 |
Saoner |
0.062 |
Kalmeshwar |
0.062 |
Ramtek |
0.059 |
Parseoni |
0.044 |
Umrer |
0.045 |
Bhiwapur |
0.042 |
Kuhi |
0.044 |
Maunda |
0.045 |
Table 12: The average concentration of Phosphorus pollutant in the runoff
Taluka |
EMC (P) |
Nagpur |
0.020 |
Kamptee |
0.016 |
Higna |
0.045 |
Katol |
0.029 |
Narkher |
0.025 |
Saoner |
0.026 |
Kalmeshwar |
0.026 |
Ramtek |
0.024 |
Parseoni |
0.018 |
Umrer |
0.0180 |
Bhiwapur |
0.017 |
Kuhi |
0.019 |
Maunda |
0.018 |